IPv6 protocol as a strategic solution for network management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71112/g5dr6m65

Keywords:

IPv6, strategic solutions, network management, transition, architecture simplification

Abstract

This article analyzes Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) as a strategic solution for network management through a review of thematic sources. It contextualizes the exhaustion of IPv4 and the need for transition to IPv6, describing the key technical characteristics of IPv6 and comparing them with IPv4 in terms of performance and management. The strategic advantages that IPv6 offers for modern network management are examined, including architectural simplification (NAT), scalability for the Internet of Things (IoT) era, and operational efficiency. Furthermore, the challenges associated with the implementation and transition to IPv6 are addressed, such as technical difficulties, training, and compatibility with legacy infrastructures. The methodology followed is documentary and bibliographic, emphasizing the search in updated scientific and technical sources. The findings present recent data on global IPv6 adoption, with an emphasis on educational environments, evidencing uneven growth patterns within educational processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akamai. (2022, 6 de junio). 10 years since World IPv6 Launch. Akamai Blog. https://www.akamai.com/blog/trends/10-years-since-world-ipv6-launch

Apple Engineering. (2020). IPv6 performance measurements on iOS 14. Apple Developer Technical Note.

Brzozowski, J. (2018). T-Mobile USA IPv6 only, 464XLAT, and what it means for you [Presentación en NANOG 72]. https://www.tiktok.com/@paco.benitez/video/7196872546254441733

Cherryservers. (2023). IPv4 vs. IPv6: Key differences and features. Cherry Servers Blog. https://www.cherryservers.com/blog/differences

Cloudflare. (2024). Cloudflare 2024 year in review. Cloudflare Radar Blog. https://blog.cloudflare.com/radar-2024-year-in-review/

Colitti, L. (2015). IPv6 at Facebook: One year later. Facebook Engineering.

Deering, S., & Hinden, R. (2017). Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) specification (RFC 8200). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200

Enriquez-Lenis, A., & Agredo-Méndez, M. (2015). Análisis de rendimiento en redes IPv6. Entramado, 11(2), 266–276. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2654/265440664016.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2015v11n1.21118

European Telecommunications Standards Institute. (2014). Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV). https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/nfv-sec/001_099/001/01.01.01_60/gs_nfv-sec001v010101p.pdf

Fang, Y., et al. (2025). An IPv6 address fast scanning method based on local domain name association. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Art. 11524. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95680-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95680-w

Godoy, J. (2022). Adopción de IPv6 en la Universidad Estatal de Campinas: Una cuestión de supervivencia en un mundo conectado. Universidad Estatal de Campinas (UNICAMP).

Google. (2024). Google IPv6 adoption statistics – January 2024. Google Transparency Report.

Huston, G. (2024). The IPv6 Internet. APNIC Labs. https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6

Internet Engineering Task Force. (2017). Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) specification (RFC 8200). RFC Editor. https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC8200

Jiménez Ramírez, L. (2024). Despliegue de IPv6 en la Facultad de Estudios Superiores Aragón. Cuadernos Técnicos Universitarios de la DGTIC, 2(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.22201/dgtic.ctud.2024.2.4.82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/dgtic.ctud.2024.2.4.82

Mizutani, H., et al. (2019). Performance measurements of IPv6 streaming at AbemaTV. Proceedings of APNOMS 2019, 33–40.

Naagas, S. V., & de Guzman, P. C. (2020). IPv6 campus transition: A Central Luzon State University case study. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 9(3), 183–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v9i3.2173

Number Resource Organization. (2011). Agotamiento del pool central de direcciones IPv4 de la IANA. https://www.reddit.com/r/USCIS/comments/17e7sbt/orig

Pulido, M. A. P., & Osorio, J. F. L. (2014). Transporte de voz en entornos IPv4 e IPv6. Revista Vis-à-vis, 13(1), 77–87.

Registro de Direcciones de Internet para América Latina y el Caribe (LACNIC). (2024). Informe anual de actividades 2023. https://www.lacnic.net/18/1/lacnic/reporte-anual

RIPE NCC. (2023). IPv6 deployment best practices: Overcoming common challenges. RIPE Network Coordination Centre. https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-docs

Thomson, S., & Narten, T. (2007). IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (RFC 4862). Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc4862

Published

2025-07-01

Issue

Section

Computational Sciences

How to Cite

Crocetta Yanuario, V. R. . (2025). IPv6 protocol as a strategic solution for network management. Multidisciplinary Journal Epistemology of the Sciences, 2(3), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.71112/g5dr6m65

Similar Articles

1-10 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.