Factores que fortalecen las interacciones educativas docente–estudiante en la Educación Media Superior: una revisión documental basada en el modelo CLASS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71112/hrx0z589Schlagwörter:
interacciones educativas;, Educación Media Superior;, apoyo emocional;, apoyo pedagógico;, CLASS.Abstract
Las interacciones educativas entre docentes y estudiantes constituyen un componente central de la calidad educativa, particularmente en la Educación Media Superior, donde confluyen exigencias académicas crecientes y procesos de desarrollo socioemocional. El presente artículo tiene como objetivo identificar y analizar, a partir de la literatura científica especializada, los factores que fortalecen dichas interacciones en este nivel educativo. Para ello, se realizó una revisión documental con criterios sistemáticos, integrando estudios empíricos, metaanálisis y reportes institucionales relevantes. El análisis se organizó a partir del modelo Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS), que estructura la calidad de las interacciones en tres dominios: apoyo emocional, organización del aula y apoyo pedagógico. Los resultados muestran que estos dominios operan de manera interdependiente y que su articulación se asocia con mayores niveles de compromiso escolar, aprendizaje profundo y permanencia educativa. Se discuten implicaciones para la práctica docente y la política educativa, con énfasis en la Educación Media Superior.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., Lun, J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Observations of effective teacher–student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the CLASS–Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9454-7
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher–student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563
Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Illeris, K. (2018). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists… in their own words (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147277
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. W. W. Norton & Company.
Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. (2019). La educación media superior en México: Resultados del aprendizaje y condiciones escolares. INEE.
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
Mejoredu (Comisión Nacional para la Mejora Continua de la Educación). (2022). Indicadores nacionales de permanencia y abandono escolar en educación media superior. MEJOREDU.
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & La Paro, K. M. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) manual. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
World Bank. (2019). TEACH: Classroom observation tool. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/32361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/32361
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2026 ANGEL GÁMEZ CUEVAS (Autor/a)
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
