Role and challenges of conciliation and decision board no. 10 in labor dispute resolution in David, Chiriquí

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71112/hsxp9089

Keywords:

Conflict resolution, legal procedure, labor dispute, labor relations, labor law, labor

Abstract

The study evaluated the role and main challenges of Conciliation and Decision Board No. 10 in resolving labor disputes in the district of David, Chiriquí province, during 2024. A quantitative, descriptive, non-experimental, and cross-sectional study was conducted, supplemented by a document review. The accessible population consisted of 56 participants directly involved in the procedure: 18 officials and 38 users, recruited through a census. Two structured questionnaires with closed-ended questions were administered, and the data were processed using absolute frequencies and percentages. The analysis related the disputes to the institutional experience and the assessments expressed by the participating groups. The data from institutional records for the first seven months of this year revealed that out of the total 2,259 disputes resolved, wrongfully dismissed cases made up 2,099 or 92.9%. Out of the number of officials surveyed, 77.8% stated that agreements are honored in due time. Nevertheless, 55.6% of respondents said that there are no written protocols presently in place. As for the users’ feedback, the data showed that 84.2% rated their experience with the Board positively or very positively, with the agreements reached satisfying 71.1% and 76.3% of people expressing willingness to use conciliation services again. These data show, therefore, that the Board is a good way to access labor justice and that it can resolve disputes effectively. However, the improvement of work of the Board requires the integration of uniform procedures, enlargement of prelitigation consultations, benefits in perception of neutrality, practice of applying hybrid hearings, as well as development of tools for electronic verification of agreement compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cano, M. R. (2012). La Conciliación Judicial como Medio Excepcional de Terminación de los Procesos Laborales y su Efectividad en la Junta de Conciliación y Decisión, de la Provincia de Veraguas [Universidad de Panamá]. https://up-rid.up.ac.pa/2663/

Cea Rodríguez, J., Medina, F. J., & Ramírez-Marín, J. (2023). Estrategias efectivas de los mediadores chilenos en conflictos laborales. Innovar, 33(88), 133-148.

Cedalise Riquelme, C. (2022). La eficacia de los Mecanismos Alternos de Solución de Conflictos en las Relaciones Laborales. Anuario de Derecho, (50), 184-208.

Código de Trabajo, Legislation No. CÓDIGO DEL TRABAJO DECRETO DE GABINETE No. 252 De 30 de diciembre de 1971 (Contiene las modificaciones de la Ley No. 44 de 12 de agosto de 1995) (1971). https://www.mitradel.gob.pa/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/c%C3%B3digo-detrabajo.pdf

Constitución Política de la República de Panamá (1972). https://ministeriopublico.gob.pa/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/constitucion-politica-con-indice-analitico.pdf

Domínguez Zazueta, V. M. (2022). La Conciliación en el Nuevo Modelo de Justicia Laboral. Revista de Investigación Académica Sin Frontera: Facultad Interdisciplinaria de Ciencias Económicas Administrativas - Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas-Campus Navojoa, (37). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46589/rdiasf.vi37.470

Feria Avila, H., Matilla González, M., & Mantecón Licea, S. (2020). La entrevista y la encuesta: ¿métodos o técnicas de indagación empírica? Didasc@lia: Didáctica y Educación, 11(3 (Julio-Septiembre)), 62-79.

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2020). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mcgraw-hill México. https://www.academia.edu/download/64591365/Metodolog%C3%ADvestigaci%C3%B3n.%20Rutas%20cuantitativa,%20cualitativa%20y%20mixta.pdf

Ley 7, Legislation No. 7 (1975). https://www.sijusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/l_7_1975_Lab.pdf

Maldonado Cando, J. L., Cabrera Granda, J., Acurio Hidalgo, G. F., & Santillán Andrade, J. R. (2024). Análisis jurídico de los mecanismos de conciliación en conflictos laborales. Dilemas contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11i3.4232

MITRADEL. (2025). Estadísticas MITRADEL. https://monitoreo.antai.gob.pa/transparencia/48/7-2025/entregas/1139

Rymanov, A., & Bocharova, I. (2019). Cuantificación de la resolución de conflictos laborales. Dilemas contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. https://dilemascontemporaneoseducacionpoliticayvalores.com/index.php/dilemas/article/view/1513

Santana Vásquez, C. (2017). Propuesta para la aplicación eficaz de la conciliación previa en materia laboral [Universidad de Panamá]. https://up-rid.up.ac.pa/1497/

Published

2026-10-15

Issue

Section

Ciencias Sociales

How to Cite

Taylor, B. . (2026). Role and challenges of conciliation and decision board no. 10 in labor dispute resolution in David, Chiriquí. Multidisciplinary Journal Epistemology of the Sciences, 3(4), 591-608. https://doi.org/10.71112/hsxp9089