Territorial model for the implementation of pedagogical agroecology in upper secondary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71112/5dcmpx50Keywords:
Pedagogical agroecology, upper secondary education, territorial implementation, community epistemological governance, territorialized curriculumAbstract
This study develops the Territorial Model for the Implementation of Pedagogical Agroecology as a theoretical and operational framework for transforming upper secondary education through a territorial, intercultural, and cognitive justice perspective. The research adopted a qualitative interpretative approach grounded in educational ethnography, Participatory Action Research, and the Territory–Body–Memory framework. Fieldwork was conducted in Indigenous communities of Ayotitlán, Jalisco, Mexico, using semi-structured interviews, agro-affective calendars, territorial transects, community time mapping, students' narratives, and participant observation. The findings led to the construction of a systemic architecture composed of four interconnected levels: implementation conditions, territorial implementation system, territorial pedagogical operation, and transformative outcomes. The model integrates territory, community, curriculum, participatory research, and pedagogical devices to strengthen the dialogue between scientific and community knowledge, community epistemological governance, and territorial regeneration. The study concludes that Pedagogical Agroecology provides an alternative framework for reorganizing educational processes from the territory, fostering contextualized learning, community participation, curriculum innovation, and sustainability. Furthermore, the model offers a transferable framework for other rural, Indigenous, and intercultural educational contexts committed to educational transformation and the regeneration of life.
Downloads
References
Als Borda, O. (1986). Conocimiento y poder popular: Lecciones con campesinos de Nicaragua, México y Colombia. Siglo XXI Editores.
Fals Borda, O. (1999). Orígenes universales y retos actuales de la IAP. Análisis Político, (38), 73–90.
Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. En B. Taylor (Ed.), Expanding boundaries: Serving and learning (pp. 2–6). Corporation for National Service.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
Lave, J., y Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Leff, E. (2004). Racionalidad ambiental: La reapropiación social de la naturaleza. Siglo XXI Editores.
Morin, E. (1999). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. UNESCO.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024a). Curriculum flexibility and autonomy: Promoting a thriving learning environment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eccbbac2-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024b). Reimagining education, realising potential. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b44e2c39-en
Parra, Y. (2013). La Otra Orilla: Territorio–Cuerpo–Memoria, pedagogía y ConoCSentir de los pueblos de Abya Yala. RUECA–Red Universitaria de Evaluación de la Calidad.
Rockwell, E. (2009). La experiencia etnográfica: Historia y cultura en los procesos educativos. Paidós.
Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms & communities. The Orion Society.
Toledo, V. M., y Barrera-Bassols, N. (2008). La memoria biocultural: La importancia ecológica de las sabidurías tradicionales. Icaria Editorial.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2024). Greening curriculum guidance: Teaching and learning for climate action. UNESCO.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ernesto Justo Cobián (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






