Errors, misconceptions, and obstacles in the understanding of function limits: an epistemological and didactic analysis of university students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71112/bznkyt39

Keywords:

Limit concept, mathematical errors, epistemological obstacles, calculus education, undergraduate mathematics, conceptual understanding

Abstract

The learning of the concept of limit of a function remains one of the most challenging topics in undergraduate calculus education, due to the persistence of errors, conceptual difficulties, and epistemological obstacles. This study aims to analyze students’ conceptions and errors related to the understanding of limits from an epistemological and didactical perspective, in order to construct an explanatory taxonomy of mathematical error.

A qualitative interpretative approach was adopted, based on the analysis of written productions, semi-structured interviews, and observation of problem-solving processes. Data analysis was conducted through open, axial, and selective coding, allowing the identification of emerging categories and their articulation with the theoretical framework.

The findings reveal three levels of error: procedural, conceptual, and epistemological. Within the epistemological level, three main obstacles were identified: the algebraic obstacle, the infinitesimal obstacle, and the unitary-pragmatic obstacle, the latter characterized by the reduction of mathematical knowledge to procedural tools aimed at task completion. It is concluded that errors are not isolated failures but manifestations of knowledge structures shaped by the interaction of cognitive, epistemological, and didactical factors.

This study contributes to mathematics education research by proposing a taxonomy of errors that provides an integrated understanding of students’ difficulties in learning limits and offers insights for the design of instructional strategies in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artigue, M., Douady, R., Moreno, L., y Gómez, P. (1995). Ingeniería didáctica en educación matemática. https://hdl.handle.net/1992/40560

Bachelard, G. (1987). La formación del espíritu científico. Siglo XXI. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1216419

Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.1005

Corica, A. R., & Otero, M. R. (2009). Análisis de una praxeología matemática universitaria. Relime, 12(3). https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1665-24362009000300002&script=sci_arttext

Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-874-620251024

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

De la Cruz Sánchez, E. L. (2020). Un modelo epistemológico de refrencia asociado al concepto del límite de una función real en un punto para una institución de nivel superior (Master's thesis, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru (Peru)). Duval, R. (1993). Registres de représentation sémiotique et fonctionnement cognitif.

Duval, R. (1999). Representation, vision and visualization. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed466379

Fajardo, J. (2024). Aproximación teórica a una didáctica orientada a identificar el conocimiento unitario y pragmático en la enseñanza de la definición de límite de una función (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador. https://www.espacio.digital.upel.edu.ve/index.php/TD/article/view/2411

Ramírez, P., y Prada, R. (2017). Obstáculos epistemológicos sobre los conceptos de límite y continuidad en cursos de cálculo diferencial en programas de ingeniería. Revista Perspectivas, 2(2), 109.Radatz, H. (1980). Students’ errors in the learning of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.22463/25909215.1316

Ramírez, H. A. (2012). Tipología de errores presentados por estudiantes de primer curso de matemáticas universitarias:(análisis epistemológico, didáctico y semiótico). https://hdl.handle.net/1992/11851

Rojas, E. R. (2023). Impacto de los conocimientos previos de álgebra y aritmética en el aprendizaje de funciones de cálculo diferencial. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación Y El Desarrollo Educativo, 14(27). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v14i27.1717

Sierpinska, A. (1985). Obstacles in the understanding of limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40247990#:~:text=https%3A//www.jstor.org/stable/40247990

Strauss, A., y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquia.

Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619.

Torres, A. E., y Uribe, J. M. (2025). Obstáculos epistemológicos y conflictos semióticos.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Published

2026-07-03

Issue

Section

Education Sciences

How to Cite

Fajardo Molinaresa, J. . (2026). Errors, misconceptions, and obstacles in the understanding of function limits: an epistemological and didactic analysis of university students. Multidisciplinary Journal Epistemology of the Sciences, 3(3), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.71112/bznkyt39