Between interactions and identities: the use of artificial intelligence in the construction of students digital identity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71112/9k9zdc04Keywords:
digital identity, generative artificial intelligence, teaching and learning processes, students, digital footprintAbstract
This qualitative study analyzes the influence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) on the construction and reconfiguration of the digital identity of graduate students at a private university. Using an inductive-deductive methodology and a multiple case study design, the technological and narrative trajectories of three students were examined through in-depth interviews and digital footprint tracking. The findings reveal that digital identity is shaped by three interdependent processes: cognitive delegation to systems, negotiation of public authenticity, and affective reordering around online presence. The case analysis demonstrates a dichotomous tension between 'techno-optimist' views, which prioritize efficiency and extended creativity, and 'techno-pessimist' positions, marked by fears of dependence and loss of cognitive autonomy. The research concludes that GAI is not merely a pedagogical tool but an epistemic infrastructure integrated into everyday life, transforming digital identity into a hybrid, socio-technical.
Downloads
References
Area, M., & Guarro, A. (2012). La alfabetización informacional y digital: Fundamentos pedagógicos para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje competente. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35(Monográfico), 46–74. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.mono.977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.mono.977
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
Boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
Cabellos, S., de Aldama, C., & Pozo, J. I. (2024). Beliefs of university teachers about generative artificial intelligence: Risks and opportunities for teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1468900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468900
Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2024). Inteligencia artificial y personalización del aprendizaje: ¿Innovación educativa o promesas recicladas? Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (89), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2024.89.3142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2024.89.3577
Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.
Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Vol. 1: The rise of the network society. Blackwell.
Chen, B. (2025). GenAI as epistemic infrastructure: Designing AI systems grounded in educational values. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06928
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We are data: Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. NYU Press.
Cornejo-Plaza, M. I., & Cippitani, R. (2023). Consideraciones éticas y jurídicas de la Inteligencia Artificial en Educación Superior: Desafíos y perspectivas. Revista de Educación y Derecho, (28). https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2023.28.41808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/REYD2023.28.43935
Dellepiane, P., & Guidi, P. (2023). La inteligencia artificial y la educación: Retos y oportunidades desde una perspectiva ética. Question/Cuestión, 3(76), e859. https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e859
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.
Gee, J. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (5th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722511
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.
Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot rights. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11444.001.0001
Harari, Y. N. (2015). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Harvill Secker.
Hernández González, L., & Soberanes Martín, A. (2024). Modelo de obtención de datos de los principales Sistemas de Gestión del Aprendizaje. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, (33). https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.33.e1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.33.e1
Jin, W., Yang, Y., Martínez-Maldonado, R., & Gašević, D. (2025). The agency gap in GenAI literacy: Understanding learners’ perceived dependence on generative AI tools. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04398
Lozano Flores, L. D., García Ávila, J., & Marín Sandoval, R. D. (2024). El Espejo Digital: la influencia de las Inteligencias Artificiales Generativas en la construcción de identidades estudiantiles [Manuscrito enviado para publicación].
Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. Polity Press.
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. Basic Books.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164
Perezchica-Vega, J. E., Sepúlveda-Rodríguez, J. A., & Román-Méndez, A. D. (2024). Inteligencia artificial generativa en la educación superior: Usos y opiniones de los profesores. Revista Colombiana de Educación. [En prensa/Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-593
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
Rojas Marín, L., Espinoza Padilla, L., & Mendoza Pacheco, H. (2024). Impacto de la inteligencia artificial en el razonamiento crítico y los procesos cognitivos en estudiantes universitarios. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(1), 13462. https://ciencialatina.org/index.php/cienciala/article/view/13462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.13462
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. Penguin Press.
Silva, A. V. C., Patiño, A. C. M., & Álava, S. P. C. (2024). Desafíos de la Educación frente a la Inteligencia artificial. Polo del Conocimiento, 9(6), 1956–1969. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v9i6.7415
Tan, M., & Maravilla, M. (2024). Generative AI and academic integrity: Rethinking authorship, evaluation, and learning design. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19088
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
Yang, Y., Jin, W., Gašević, D., & Martínez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Improving critical engagement with GenAI through editing-based learning tasks. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07200
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jorge García Ávila, Luis Daniel Lozano Flores (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
