Use of the CLIL approach to strengthen reading skills in Ecuadorian technical high school students through computer science-related materials.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71112/g4tc8m15Keywords:
reading comprehension, English as a foreign language, Informatics, secondary education.Abstract
Learning English as a foreign language represents a major challenge for high school students in Ecuador, particularly in the development of reading comprehension. This study analyzed the relationship between the application of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach, mediated by Informatics-related material, and the development of English reading skills. A quantitative, quasi-experimental, comparative–correlational design was used, complemented by a qualitative component. The participants were 121 technical high school students majoring in Informatics: an experimental group (n = 60) that worked with the CLIL methodology through technical vocabulary, specialized readings, the Informatics Dictionary project, and interactive activities, and a control group (n = 61) that followed traditional language instruction. A ten-point reading proficiency test assessed five sub-skills (skimming, scanning, vocabulary in context, making inferences, and structure and purpose), together with a Likert-scale perception questionnaire and an open-ended question. The experimental group obtained a higher mean score (M = 8.17; SD = 2.10) than the control group (M = 7.61; SD = 2.30), with a statistically significant difference in the skimming sub-skill (p = .033) and a small overall effect size (d = 0.25). More than 72% of the respondents valued the methodology positively across all dimensions, and the qualitative analysis highlighted technical vocabulary acquisition, motivation, and the connection with students' future professional life. It is concluded that CLIL with Informatics-related material is a relevant pedagogical alternative to strengthen English reading skills in Ecuadorian technical high school education.
Downloads
References
Andrade Mendoza, J. L., Padilla, Y., & Padilla, N. (2020). Bilingual education in a CLIL context, an intervention proposal in Ecuador. Ciencia Digital, 4(1), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v4i1.1060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v4i1.1060
Argudo, J., Abad, M., Fajardo-Dack, T., & Cabrera, P. (2018). Analyzing a pre-service EFL program through the lenses of the CLIL approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4
Ball, P. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL materials design. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484036
Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford University Press.
Banegas, D. L. (2022). Research into practice: CLIL in South America. Language Teaching, 55(3), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000622
Barre, P., & Villafuerte, J. (2021). English as a foreign language instruction in Ecuador: Implementation of the content and language integrated-learning during 2019–2021. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i2.3295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i2.4295
Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2020). Teaching English through pedagogical translanguaging. World Englishes, 39(2), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12462
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549
Coyle, D., & Meyer, O. (2021). Beyond CLIL: Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914505
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150484
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274-2
Hemmi, C., & Banegas, D. L. (Eds.). (2021). International perspectives on CLIL. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524841
Kussaiynkyzy, G., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2021). Systematic review of CLIL in computer science: Past, present, and future — with a special focus on using ICT. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 14(2), 323–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2021.14.2.6
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 30–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874913500801010030
Lin, A. M. Y. (2016). Language across the curriculum & CLIL in English as an additional language (EAL) contexts: Theory and practice. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1802-2
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. European Commission.
Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro, 21, 15–33.
Meyer, O., & Coyle, D. (2017). Pluriliteracies teaching for learning: Conceptualizing progression for deeper learning in literacies development. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0006
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924
Morton, T., & Llinares, A. (2017). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Type of programme or pedagogical model? In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp. 1–16). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.01mor
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Llinares, A. (2013). CLIL classroom discourse: Research from Europe. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2018). The effects of CLIL on L1 and content learning: Updated empirical evidence from monolingual contexts. Learning and Instruction, 57, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.002
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (Eds.). (2009). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691675
Sylvén, L. K. (2013). CLIL in Sweden – why does it not work? A metaperspective on CLIL across contexts in Europe. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777387
Teng, F. (2020). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy, 54(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Eugenia Orellana Cobo, Erika Vanessa Mejía Landi, Evelyn Vanessa Peralta Villalta (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
