From digital ageism to cognitive agency: exploring Virtual Reality and aging
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71112/v1c4f548Keywords:
Aging, Virtual Reality, Cognitive Stimulation, Attitudes Toward Technology, Digital AgeismAbstract
This qualitative research was conducted at a long-term care facility for older adults in Ecatepec, Estado de México. The study aimed to explore the perceptions of caregivers, university volunteers, and elderly residents regarding the use of Virtual Reality (VR) for cognitive stimulation in later life. Framed within a biopsychosocial perspective on aging, the research responds to epidemiological forecasts suggesting that individuals aged 65 and older may represent up to 16% of the global population by 2050. Data was collected through open interviews and focus groups, yielding three analytical categories: conceptions of aging, digital ageism, and cognitive agency in old age. Results indicated that perceptions of aging play a critical role in the willingness to engage with VR technologies. Although traces of digital ageism were identified, the study also revealed a notable degree of agency among older adults, who demonstrated interest and self-efficacy in their interactions with VR. These findings highlight the importance of integrating users’ attitudes and beliefs toward digital tools when designing interventions aimed at promoting cognitive well-being in aging populations.
Downloads
References
Aldana González, G., García Gómez, L., & Jacobo Mata, A. (2012). Las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC) como alternativa para la estimulación de los procesos cognitivos en la vejez. CPU-e, Revista de Investigación Educativa, 14, 153–166. http://www.uv.mx/cpue/num14/practica/aldana_garcia_mata_tic_vejez.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.25009/cpue.v0i14.34
Anguera, J. A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J. L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J., … Gazzaley, A. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501, 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12486
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Exercise control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2022). Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301006.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301006.x
Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2017). Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist, 58(3), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw249
Du, Q., Song, Z., Jiang, H., Wei, X., Weng, D., & Fan, M. (2024). LightSword: A customized virtual reality exergame for long-term cognitive inhibition training in older adults. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24), Article 462. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642187
Finkel, D., Reynolds, C. A., McArdle, J. J., & Gatz, M. (2019). Cohort differences in trajectories of cognitive aging. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 64B(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn033
Gazzaley, A., & D'Esposito, M. (2020). Unifying prefrontal cortex function: Executive control, neural networks, and top-down modulation. In R. Cabeza, L. Nyberg, & D. Park (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of aging: Linking cognitive and cerebral aging (pp. 69–84). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0005
Hummert, M. L., Garstka, T. A., Ryan, E. B., & Bonnesen, J. L. (2004). The role of age stereotypes in interpersonal communication. In J. F. Nussbaum & J. Coupland (Eds.), The handbook of communication and aging research (2nd ed., pp. 91–114). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2023). Estadísticas del envejecimiento en México (Base de datos). https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/envejecimiento
Instituto Nacional de las Personas Adultas Mayores. (2016). Perfil Demográfico, Epidemiológico y Social de la Población Adulta Mayor en el País: Una propuesta de política pública. Gobierno de México.
Torpil, B., Şahin, S., Pekçetin, S., & Uyanık, M. (2021). The effectiveness of a virtual reality-based intervention on cognitive functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Games for Health Journal, 10(2), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2020.0086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2020.0086
Kramer, A. F., & Erickson, K. I. (2021). Capitalizing on cortical plasticity: Influence of physical activity on cognition and brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.009
Levy, B. R. (2025). Combating ageism with science: Robert Butler shaping of ageism research. The Gerontologist, 65(2), gnae167. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae167
Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., & Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longitudinal benefit of positive self-perceptions of aging on functional health. Journal of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(5), P409–P417. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.5.p409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.5.P409
Marqués, S., Mariano, J., Mendonça, J., De Tavernier, W., Hess, M., Naegele, L., Peixeiro, F., & Martins, D. (2020). Determinants of ageism against older adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072560
Mendoza Núñez, V. M., Martínez Maldonado, M. de la L., & Vargas Guadarrama, L. A. (Eds.). (2008). Viejismo: Prejuicios y estereotipos de la vejez. UNAM.
Nguyen, L., Murphy, K., & Andrews, G. (2019). Cognitive and neural plasticity in old age: A systematic review of evidence from executive functions cognitive training. Ageing Research Reviews, 53, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100912
Optale, G., Baglio, F., Cattaneo, A., Piras, F., Mondini, S., & Riva, G. (2020). Videogame experience and neuroplasticity: Studies on cognitive reserve. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 10(2), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00559.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00559.x
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2016). Las actitudes negativas acerca del envejecimiento y la discriminación contra las personas mayores pueden afectar a su salud. https://www.who.int/es/news/item/29-09-2016-discrimination-and-negative-attitudes-about-ageing-are-bad-for-your-health
Remm, S. E., Halcomb, E., Peters, K., Hatcher, D., & Frost, S. A. (2023). Self-efficacy, resilience and healthy ageing among older people who have an acute hospital admission: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Open, 10, 7168–7177. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1960
Reyes-Alpizar, E. A., & Cano-Estrada, A. (2024). Deterioro cognitivo y demencia durante el envejecimiento. Saber más. https://www.sabermas.umich.mx/secciones/articulos/1376-deterioro-cognitivo-y-demencia-durante-el-envejecimiento.html
Rivoir, A., Morales, M. J., & Casamayou, A. (2019). Usos y percepciones de las tecnologías digitales en personas mayores: Limitaciones y beneficios para su calidad de vida. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 36, 295–313. https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2019.n36-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2019.n36-15
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (2015). Successful aging 2.0: Conceptual expansions for the 21st century. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 70(4), 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv025
Salthouse, T. A. (2019). Trajectories of normal cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 34(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000288
Silva Concha, L. M. (2004). Modelo psicosocial y envejecimiento: Análisis, reflexividad y posibilidades en programas y políticas de la tercera edad. Revista Chilena de Terapia Ocupacional, (4), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5346.2004.160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5346.2004.160
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affair, Population Division. (2022). World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO.3
Vaportzis, E., Clausen, M. G., & Gow, A. J. (2017). Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: A focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Liliana García Gómez, Gabriela Aldana González, Rodolfo Zola García Lozano, Juan de Jesús Amador Reyes (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
